Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The 56 Point TA; Charts With an Attitude -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave H who wrote (9873)	12/31/1997 11:05:00 AM
From: ivan solotaroff	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 79227

Dave H: I think ODETA's apparent "gap" was a 2:1 (actually looks like a 1.9:1 split). Maybe wrong, but look at the volume that day. Gappers have volume spikes that look like they could kill a team o' vampires. Ivan

To: Dave H who wrote (9873)	12/31/1997 12:35:00 PM
From: Esteban	Respond to of 79227

Morning Dave, I not sure whether ODETA had a true gap or not. My PC Quote charts are suppossed to adjust for splits, and it shows the gap plainly. In any case given the doubt about it and the plethora of candidates, I'm removing it from the list. However, assuming it was a cat, yesterday was a valid signal, hypothetically speaking. Nice detective work, Dave. The only gaps down that really disturb me are ones that violate the signal low on the following day, and this one didn't. Otherewise you're still in the game within the loss parameters that you understood when you entered on the signal day. Esteban