Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (947060)	7/14/2016 4:41:41 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576167

So they were carrying to look tough when, in fact, they were just pussies with guns......as we all know most of them are....... But all those idiots want to carry in crowded places......

To: jlallen who wrote (947060)	7/16/2016 10:57:37 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576167

Also beyond the specifics of this one case, people having guns in an area isn't a guaranteed way to stop a violent attack, it just creates the possibility that they will be able to stop the attack. Its not like any one case amounts to evidence that guns are useless for defense against mass shootings, esp. not when its posted in reply to a case of defense by a person with a privately owned firearm, and in light of the fact that when a mass shooting is stopped by a citizen with his own firearm the death toll is typically lower then when its stopped by cops. (And that's not even considering the cases where a potential mass shooting is stopped before it has enough victems to qualify as a mass shooting). If guns were really so useless (for anyone but murderers as JF Sheppard seems to think) then why arm cops? Its not like cops are supermen. There people like anyone else. If they can stop a situation with guns so can non-cops.