SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (947267)7/15/2016 1:17:10 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation

Recommended By
jlallen

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576901
 
They had some use in the War of 1812 and the Civil War as well. But many of the US wars were outside our territory (where the militia will by its nature be useless in direct terms).

Militia forces have gradually gotten less useful in pitched battled (and even in the Revolutionary War they were on the average less capable then the regulars in such a situation), but they are well suited to any sort of guerilla campaign should one ever be necessary against a foreign invader (as unlikely as such a thing is for the foreseeable future) or a shift to severe oppression by the US government (although things have to get really bad before such a campaign should even be considered, and even then its hardly a perfect solution both in terms of costs it imposes on the country and in terms of the difficulty involved in waging such a conflict).

And yeah, the amendment is limited to militias.

Not in English it isn't. Perhaps your reading a poor translation in to a different language.



To: combjelly who wrote (947267)7/15/2016 2:45:55 PM
From: jlallen1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TimF

  Respond to of 1576901
 
Really...where does it say the right of the militia to bear arms should not be infringed?

It does not.