SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 2MAR$ who wrote (947364)7/15/2016 6:36:58 PM
From: Sdgla3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bonefish
dave rose
locogringo

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575193
 
Why dream ? If what the founders believed was a concern then Hillary, clearly a lying crook, would be indicted for her careless handling of classified info and her clear attempts to hide her pay for favors scheme with her foundation.

The question is how do dems like you turn the other way when the evidence is overwhelming ?

It is clear Trump is in position to win the WH because of the Clintons and Obama's corruption.

You dems were close to nominating a career socialist who vacationed on his honeymoon in Moscow !!



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (947364)7/15/2016 6:40:07 PM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Old Boothby

  Respond to of 1575193
 
Trump has 1 in 100 chances of being elected,

Psst......please go tell the LATimes, Rasmussen, ABC and the other polling agencies. They are making fools of themselves. How did you ever get so smart? Please share it with the other imbeciles.

LATIMES POLL: TRUMP IN LEAD...

Trump leads Clinton by 7 points: Rasmussen poll



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (947364)7/15/2016 10:43:02 PM
From: Bonefish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575193
 
I tell you what, I'll even give you 1 to 50 odds. How much you wanna bet?



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (947364)7/19/2016 5:34:27 AM
From: puborectalis3 Recommendations

Recommended By
2MAR$
bentway
Fiscally Conservative

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575193
 
About 400 of 650 institutional investors surveyed by Morgan Stanley said Trump would materially change their markets in the first months of his presidency. They think he might hurt the dollar, tank stocks and hurt Treasury bonds at a time of an ongoing, global investment drought that will worsen thanks to Trump’s proposed tariff barriers against China and Mexico. That’s even as the Federal Reserve raises interest rates to preempt the inflationary effect of a tax cut adding $9.5 trillion to the national debt. Other banks are coming up with similar surveys.

And then there’s Zandi’s analysis, which was so far out of character that it was impossible to miss.

“The economy will be significantly weaker if Mr. Trump’s economic proposals are adopted,” Zandi and three colleagues write. “[If] all his stated policies become law, the economy suffers a lengthy recession and is smaller at the end of his four-year term than when he took office. By the end of his presidency, there are close to 3.5 million fewer jobs and the unemployment rate rises to as high as 7%, compared with below 5% today. During Mr. Trump’s presidency, the average American household’s after-inflation income will stagnate, and stock prices and real house values will decline.”

Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln says “Thumbs up!”

The verdict is much the same at Oxford Economics, which has the recession beginning next year and costing the U.S. 3 million jobs. That’s worse than the 2.8 million lost in the 2001-2003 recession. Incomes would shrink and unemployment would hit 7.6% by 2019 — two years sooner than Zandi’s model forecasts 7.3% joblessness.

Trump will obviously say something different on Thursday night — if he talks economics at all.