Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bonefish who wrote (949223)	7/23/2016 6:30:25 PM
From: locogringo	2 Recommendations Recommended By Honey_Bee Old Boothby Respond to of 1575607

Who'd want Hillary to have nuke codes. Her husband, BJ, to get rid of the hundreds of "bimbo's" that he's soiled and destroyed. Ask James Carville. All that "trailer trash" should be nuked. I'm still trying to figure out what to think of a dedicated wife that doesn't mind hundreds of "trailer trash" in her bedroom. Mind boggling for sure, but liberals certainly are deranged and demented. Then again, there is one broad here that gets very hot flashes over Hillary, but why start at the end of the alphabet.

To: Bonefish who wrote (949223)	7/23/2016 8:15:34 PM
From: combjelly	1 Recommendation Recommended By bentway Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575607

Pretty much anybody. Especially when compared to Trump. No, Putin and Trump have a history. Not only has Trump expressed admiration for the way Putin runs the Russian Federation, Trump is deeply in debt to Putin and the Russian oligarchs. All of the western banks except for one German bank, won't do business with Trump. But the Russians have been more than happy to loan him money, even before his run for the presidency. This probably explains Trump's eagerness to dump NATO. So, do you really think it is a good idea to have a president who is in debt to the Russians?