SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line: will it survive ...? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Follies who wrote (6630)12/31/1997 2:32:00 PM
From: steve lipson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13594
 
Exactamundo!

The Internet eliminates some middlemen, but it creates opportunities for new ones at the same time.

The idea that the Internet's value proposition was in eliminating all middlemen was a popular prediction a year or two ago, at that embarrassing stage in the life cycle of new technology when it's far too early to see how it will really be used. Still, some people have to make predictions for a living, so they end up saying some pretty stupid things.

There's ample historical precedent for disregarding that kind of black and white prediction. People are always tempted to see the impact of new technology as coming directly out of the hide of some traditional business. The impact is usually much more subtle, as well as far reaching. The whole point of investing in new technology infrastructure is usually because it allows us to do things we never could do before, creating new demand, rather than a substitution effect. The fax did not eliminate Fed Ex, or even the Post Office. While there are examples like buggy whips and slide rules, think how many generations ago we first heard phrases like "the cashless society," or "the paperless office." Technologically feasible, but not consumer friendly. No sale.

You can make a better case that the Internet reduces demand for physical infrastructure. How many bookstores did Amazon.com not have to build in order to serve consumers nationwide. But wait, why didn't each publisher simply put up a Web site and eliminate the bookselling middleman?

Now perhaps we're on the same page.



To: Follies who wrote (6630)12/31/1997 3:12:00 PM
From: White Shoes  Respond to of 13594
 
Good summary. I'm with Dale. In the long run (my opinion), the middleman is just annoying clutter to most consumers...AOL's method of organizing the clutter is no different (possibly worse) than a lot of ways...AOL isn't a big phone or cable utility and it is these companies who IMO will provide the next wave of simple, fast internet connections. AOL isn't $9.3 billion good.