SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: W. Clinton Terry who wrote (41849)12/31/1997 3:13:00 PM
From: Gary Wisdom  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
Clinton, give it up. Please. Don't worry about the CNBC post.

It is so far off base that it's almost as meaningless as Rockhead.

Enjoy your New Year's.



To: W. Clinton Terry who wrote (41849)12/31/1997 3:13:00 PM
From: Spank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
someone asked if the "quiet period" referred only to earnings
related info. Is this true? (not like it matters for iom)

-Spank



To: W. Clinton Terry who wrote (41849)12/31/1997 3:19:00 PM
From: Naggrachi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
<<Is it not worth a moment of investigation? >>

If it's something worth investigating, then the answer is yes. However, what your reffering to, is not worth investigating. I think the CC that was held a couple of weeks ago should answer any silly questions about IOM making any money next year.

This who thing is so stupit, it's not even funny. At least Rockhead provides laughter with his silly posts. However, CNBC......

Zead


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News