Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (952021)	7/31/2016 7:54:07 AM
From: Alighieri	2 Recommendations Recommended By bentway zax Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578208

Clearly, you haven't bothered to listen to Gowdy interrogation of Comey. Or perhaps it sailed right over your head. I watched it live and "clearly" you don't, or chose not to understand how the law works...what Gowdy regurgitates in a series of answers provided under different environments and circumstances, to try to prove a lie by Clinton, makes for good theater for the useful idiots but don't prove an indictable offense. And 3 (c) markings, two of which staff errors, in a chain of emails among 30000 total emails don't prove a lie...it's entirely plausible for a busy secretary of state to have missed them, particularly when she herself asked the staff to sanitize two of the three...lastly, retroactively re-classified emails has been denounced by people other than interested parties as overreach (see Powell's comments on the matter). The only political act here were Comey's harsh remarks, which I believe were said by him to give the appearance of impartiality and give republicans a bone. This was a whole bunch of nothing that republicans turned into a "scandal", just as they did Benghazi. They struggle to win at the ballot box so you cheat, distort, pass laws that disenfranchise opponents, gerrymander, and support aberrant candidates like Trump. Al