SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: locogringo who wrote (952616)8/1/2016 10:35:38 AM
From: TideGlider4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bonefish
dave rose
locogringo
tntpal

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575602
 
How the end game works for dems




To: locogringo who wrote (952616)8/1/2016 10:36:16 AM
From: locogringo5 Recommendations

Recommended By
dave rose
jlallen
Old Boothby
Taro
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575602
 
MSNBC: Pat Smith’s Speech Was ‘Offensive’
But Khizr Khan’s Was ‘Memorable’



Both the Republican and Democratic conventions gave speaking slots to grieving parents of a son killed in combat, but — according to MSNBC’s Steve Benen — Khizr Khan’s DNC speech was “memorable,” while Pat Smith’s RNC speech was “offensive.” Smith, whose son, Sean, was killed in Benghazi, slammed Hillary for allegedly lying to her about the cause of her son’s death. “In an email to her daughter shortly after the attack, Hillary Clinton blamed it on terrorism. But when I saw Hillary Clinton at Sean’s coffin ceremony, just days later, she looked me squarely in the eye and told me...

Original Article



To: locogringo who wrote (952616)8/1/2016 12:14:15 PM
From: Wharf Rat1 Recommendation

Recommended By
zax

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575602
 
Isn't it amazing, that a guy who has never done politics before comes out of nowhere, and gives one of the most powerful convention speeches ever? They'll be talking about Khan in 100 years.

Here’s what Ambassador Stevens’ sister (who’s also the family spokesperson), Dr. Anne Stevens. had to say about whether or not she felt her brother’s death had been politicized:
Yes! Definitely politicized. Every report I read that mentions him specifically has a political bent, an accusatory bent. One point that seems to be brought up again and again is the accusation that the attack was a response to the video. I could understand why that conclusion would be made, because it was right after the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Egypt. But, frankly, it doesn’t matter that that was the thinking, that night, about why the attack occurred. It’s irrelevant to bring that up again and again. It is done purely for political reasons. Dr. Stevens also went on to say that it’s “not appropriate” for some (mostly Republicans) to use her brother’s death as an election issue and that he had “a lot of respect” for Hillary Clinton. She also said that this new report recently released didn’t “look like anything new” and that what Republicans found was what we had already known.

Read more at: forwardprogressives.com