SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (953445)8/3/2016 1:17:53 PM
From: locogringo1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Old Boothby

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574854
 
P.S. - Even me pointing this out is going to draw out the response "omg u support trump u bigot" ...

Along with the "comrade" routine.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (953445)8/3/2016 2:30:29 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 1574854
 
"Just like a sitting Supreme Court justice never did this before Darth Bader Ginsberg."
"Founding Fathers did it" alert

In 1800, just a decade after the court was founded, so many of its justices were out campaigning for John Adams that the opening of the court term had to be delayed. Two-hundred and some years later, it’s more taboo than it once was for a justice to openly endorse a particular candidate—but that hasn’t really stopped the country’s top legal officials from taking sides: As recently as election night, 2000, when NBC declared for Democratic candidate Al Gore, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor told the guests at an election party that the Democrat’s election victory was “terrible.” (Of course, her criticism was a little premature, as we now know.) She then went on to participate in making sure nothing so terrible would happen, casting the crucial fifth vote in Bush v. Gore without blinking an eye. O’Connor had a long history of rooting for the Bushes in presidential elections. In 1988, she wrote to longtime political ally Senator Barry Goldwater, in a letter now in his public archives, that she “would be thankful if George B wins. It is vital for the Court and the nation that he does.”

Read more: politico.com

A surprisingly large number of U.S. Supreme Court Justices have harbored presidential aspirations. In at least three quarters of the presidential elections between 1832 and 1956, one or more Justices attempted to obtain a presidential or vice presidential nomination or were prominently mentioned as potential candidates. Until the 1950s, many Justices were appointed because they were prominent in national politics. Only a few became prominent in national politics merely because they were Justices. Several Justices conducted covert presidential campaigns, and a few even openly campaigned from the bench. During the nineteenth century, several received substantial number of votes at party conventions. On numerous occasions, political parties or political leaders encouraged Justices to become presidential candidates.

scotusblog.com



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (953445)8/9/2016 5:18:39 PM
From: John Vosilla  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1574854
 
Considering he never ran even a lemonade stand and had the thinnest resume ever coming into the office is quite ironic to me. Unfortunately I doubt Obama goes off quietly and clears brush like GWB did after he left office..