SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : ARIAD Pharmaceuticals -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jesspro who wrote (4352)8/3/2016 10:35:01 PM
From: Biomaven  Respond to of 4474
 
>>s that not enough as a bargaining tool for the company to appeal for a 1st line case to the FDA?

No, you need a proper trial to get a 1L label.

There were 8 1L patients in the trial, but that's not enough to get anything on the label.

Have to test against criz, the existing 1L drug.



To: jesspro who wrote (4352)8/3/2016 10:56:01 PM
From: jaybe  Respond to of 4474
 
The appeal resulted in ALTA-1L, a potential frontline approval on only 270 patients (135 on briga). The sort of approval you're suggesting is seen only in diseases with NO available options, even chemo here counts as a viable alternative. What we don't know is what magnitude of benefit in mPFS over criz at interim (50% and 75% of events) could trigger early termination of the trial.



To: jesspro who wrote (4352)8/8/2016 8:55:18 PM
From: tktom  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4474
 
Jaybe, supposing many new virgin patients are prescribed Brigatinib (off label) by conscientious oncologists, Granting that the results of these off label treatments are parallel to their clinical trials(on par or better than Alec), is that not enough as a bargaining tool for the company to appeal for a 1st line case to the FDA?
What do you mean by a "virgin" patient? Has many connotations..