Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (71304)	8/4/2016 6:41:31 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86355

>> My original contention was that US temperatures don't support a claim climate is getting more extreme. I missed that. I thought you were picking up the mantle from Mq on global warming. >> You focused on a part of one chart which showed an upslope apparently wanting to shift away from the extreme issue. Not at all. I picked 3 time intervals - the entire chart, the last 100 years, and the last 40 years (which is about as long as I can remember). I grant you that if one was to cherry pick from the abnormal peak in the middle to the trough some 20 years later, one can come to a different conclusion. But that would mean ignoring the past 40 years and ignoring the chart as a whole. I never thought the debate was about extreme weather. >> Trump is arranging for Hillary to win a blowout. Seriously?! You think he is a Manchurian candidate?