SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (954232)8/5/2016 11:15:55 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577837
 
One person's relatively small benefit is another's 75 years of solvency for SSTF. Of course, we still need to have employer's pay their fair share (6%, or so) for each robot they hire to replace a tax-payer. That's 6%/each worker displaced.



To: TideGlider who wrote (954232)8/5/2016 2:17:59 PM
From: gronieel2  Respond to of 1577837
 
...As I said before it is more responsible to simply raise the income tax rather than make ridiculous demands for a relatively small benefit....

Sure, raise the income tax where you get ZERO benefits....you don't get to choose. You just pay or you go to jail. But it is voluntary you see.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News