SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Techniclone (TCLN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Baker who wrote (972)12/31/1997 5:45:00 PM
From: EZLibra  Respond to of 3702
 
Huh? What name calling? What question about a stock price in April? I always pay market price. You have me confused with someone else? Why don't you e-mail me so you can keep off topic Off Topic.

I assume you mean April 1. I'll pick 7 1/8.



To: Jim Baker who wrote (972)1/1/1998 1:48:00 PM
From: Alys Hall  Respond to of 3702
 
Jim...who is this Darth Vader? Please don't be so mysterious, if you can blow away some of Shero's assumptions...let's hear it. Since I am part of the uninformed, I'd like very much to be enlightened. You seem so well informed and since you do not seem to have any other SI interests, I must believe that you expend all of your considerable energies following your TCLN investment. I would like to ask you to share with us what you are referring to in this posting as "really interesting information". We, as investors, cannot do anything other than buy,sell or hold. Those of us who are averaging in here are, in a sense, disagreeing with you about the possible courses of action that can be taken by the Company under the direction of a competent, respected and dynamic new CEO. If we are wrong, time will tell and we will pay the price for our decision.If we didn't believe this, I guess we would sell or wait hoping for better times so we could sell then. But I cannot figure out what your agenda is. Is it that you think that Shero and Davis are the enemies? If so,enemies of what or of whom? They do appear to post with knowledgeable and reasonable input and if they are wrong, they risk being proven wrong by anyone who can refute or dispute, again with sound and documented information. The most confusing thing to me is the innuendo and combativeness of your postings? What is it that you object to, why and what do you think is really going on? \Surely you cannot dispute that the stock has set a new low for the year on Dec. 31, 1997 and that the stockholders have legitimate concerns for the future of the Company. None of us want to see this Company go out of business, but truly want it to succeed and are willing to provide some funding with a change in management. Is that what you find offensive? Please clarify..I'd like to understand the tone of your messages and the reasons for it...