Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Conservatives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (80104)	8/9/2016 8:41:00 AM
From: Mevis	Respond to of 125528

hey roger, thats my girl, NOW you have gone too far. LOL. This further explains her absence.

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (80104)	8/9/2016 10:48:14 AM
From: SmoothSail	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 125528

repeated complaints about Roger Ailes sexual harassing Back in the early 2000s, a woman named Andrea Mackris, a producer for Fox, brought a sexual harassment suit against Bill O'Reilly. It was the topic of conversation on his show for awhile - I remember listening to his program driving to work while he vigorously defended himself. Then one day he issued a statement saying that the suit had been settled and there would be no further discussion about it. Fox paid her off and she disappeared into oblivion, and O'Reilly kept his job. Don't remember too many of the details, but it seemed to go on forever and then one day, it all disappeared and O'Reilly went on as usual. I thought it curious how fast the matter with Ailes was resolved - with him losing his job - and thought there had to be a lot more going on than was being made public. Then Meghyn Kelly steps forward with a "Yeah that happened to me too," kind of statement. Now Tantaros. Allegedly all Ailes did was make comments on these women's physical attributes. For that he should lose his job - immediately? And Fox pay him millions to go away? O'Reilly kept his job for doing something similar. Has to be more there that we don't know about.