SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RMF who wrote (955770)8/11/2016 2:10:45 PM
From: Broken_Clock2 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574509
 
Caught lying red handed....HRC = crook

+++++++++

Emails renew questions about Clinton Foundation and State Department overlap
By Eric Lichtblau, New York Times Wednesday, August 10, 2016 9:30am




Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, speaks at the Borinquen Health Care Center in Miami on Tuesday. The center is near the area identified by the CDC where the Zika virus is being spread by mosquitos. [Scott McIntyre | New York Times]



WASHINGTON — A new batch of U.S. State Department emails released Tuesday showed the close and sometimes overlapping interests between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department when Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state.


Related News/Archive
  • State Department Inspector General issued subpoena to Clinton Foundation
    6 Months Ago

  • State Department misses court-ordered goal on Clinton email release
    7 Months Ago

  • GOP sues State Department over access to Clinton emails
    5 Months Ago





  • The documents raised new questions about whether the charitable foundation worked to reward its donors with access and influence at the State Department, a charge that Clinton has faced in the past and has always denied.

    In one email exchange, for instance, an executive at the Clinton Foundation in 2009 sought to put a billionaire donor in touch with the U.S. ambassador to Lebanon because of the donor's interests there.

    In another email, the foundation appeared to push aides to Clinton to help find a job for a foundation associate. Her aides indicated that the department was working on the request.

    Clinton's presidential campaign, which has been shadowed for 17 months by the controversy over the private email server she used exclusively while at the State Department, had no immediate comment on the documents.

    The State Department turned the new emails over to a conservative advocacy group, Judicial Watch, as part of a lawsuit that the group brought under the Freedom of Information Act.

    The documents included 44 emails that were not among some 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton had previously given to the State Department, which she said represented all her "work-related" emails. The document release centers on discussions between Clinton's aides and Clinton Foundation executives about a number of donors and associates with interests before the State Department.

    Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch, charged that Clinton "hid" the documents from the public because they appeared to contradict her official pledge in 2009 to remove herself from Clinton Foundation business while leading the State Department.

    The documents indicate, he said in a telephone interview, that "the State Department and the Clinton Foundation worked hand in hand in terms of policy and donor effort."

    "There was no daylight between the two under Mrs. Clinton, and this was contrary to her promises," he added.

    A number of the email exchanges released Tuesday included Huma Abedin, who was a top adviser to Clinton at the State Department and later worked at the Clinton Foundation.

    In April 2009, Doug Band, who led the foundation's Clinton Global Initiative, emailed Abedin and Cheryl Mills, another top adviser to Clinton, for help with a donor.

    Band wrote that he needed to connect Gilbert Chagoury, a Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire who was one of the foundation's top donors, with someone at the State Department to talk about his interests in Lebanon.

    "It's jeff feltman," Abedin answered, referring to Jeffrey Feltman, who was the American ambassador to Lebanon at the time. "I'm sure he knows him. I'll talk to jeff."

    Band asked her to call Chagoury immediately if possible. "This is very important," he wrote.

    In a separate email exchange, Band passed along to Abedin and Mills a request for "a favor" from an associate who had recently been on a Clinton Foundation trip to Haiti and was apparently seeking work at the State Department.

    The State Department deleted much of the information about the associate, including his name and the outcome of the job referral, in turning over the emails to Judicial Watch.

    In one undeleted section, however, Band wrote that it was "important to take care of" the associate's request. A short time later, Abedin wrote back to say: "We all have him on our radar. Personnel has been sending him options."

    The FBI spent more than a year examining Clinton's use of a private email account, but it is not clear how the work of the Clinton Foundation figured into that investigation.

    James Comey, the FBI director, was noticeably circumspect in an appearance last month before the House oversight committee when Republicans questioned whether the investigation had looked at the Clinton Foundation. Twice, he declined to say.

    Comey said that Clinton had been "extremely careless" and even "negligent" in using the private email account. But he decided not to recommend criminal charges in the case because he said it did not appear that she or her aides had intended to violate the law. The Justice Department accepted his recommendation, closing the case.

    While Comey said he was convinced that Clinton had testified truthfully on the email controversy in a closed 3 1/2-hour interview with his investigators, he indicated that her public statements had contradicted the facts of the case on a number of key points.

    Republicans have asked the Justice Department to open a perjury investigation.



    To: RMF who wrote (955770)8/12/2016 9:06:47 AM
    From: longnshort2 Recommendations

    Recommended By
    locogringo
    TideGlider

      Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574509
     
    it's the culture 100 SHOT CHICAGO 1 WEEK... Rap Star Blasts 'Godfather'...



    To: RMF who wrote (955770)8/12/2016 9:09:40 AM
    From: longnshort5 Recommendations

    Recommended By
    Bonefish
    FJB
    jlallen
    locogringo
    TideGlider

      Respond to of 1574509
     
    Neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson: It's Critical For Hillary to Release Full Health Records 8 prisonplanet



    To: RMF who wrote (955770)8/12/2016 11:10:03 AM
    From: longnshort2 Recommendations

    Recommended By
    FJB
    locogringo

      Respond to of 1574509
     
    Modern liberalism has hit the Black family with the force of a nuclear blast. We're 6 decades af 8 heritage



    Walter E. Williams

    Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University



    One of the unavoidable consequences of youth is the tendency to think behavior we see today has always been. I’d like to dispute that vision, at least as it pertains to black people.

    I graduated from Philadelphia’s Benjamin Franklin High School in 1954. Franklin’s predominantly black students were from the poorest North Philadelphia neighborhoods.

    During those days, there were no policemen patrolling the hallways. Today, close to 400 police patrol Philadelphia schools. There were occasional after-school fights—rumbles, as we called them—but within the school, there was order. In contrast with today, students didn’t use foul language to teachers, much less assault them.

    Places such as the Richard Allen housing project, where I lived, became some of the most dangerous and dysfunctional places in Philadelphia. Mayhem—in the form of murders, shootings, and assaults—became routine.

    The Daily Signal is the multimedia news organization of The Heritage Foundation. We’ll respect your inbox and keep you informed.

    Sign Up

    By the 1980s, residents found that they had to have window bars and multiple locks. The 1940s and ’50s Richard Allen project, as well as other projects, bore no relation to what they became. Many people never locked their doors; windows weren’t barred. We did not go to bed with the sound of gunshots. Most of the residents were two-parent families with one or both parents working.

    How might one explain the greater civility of Philadelphia and other big-city, predominantly black neighborhoods and schools during earlier periods compared with today? Would anyone argue that during the ’40s and ’50s, there was less racial discrimination and poverty? Was academic performance higher because there were greater opportunities? Was civility in school greater in earlier periods because black students had more black role models in the form of black principals, teachers, and guidance counselors? That’s nonsense, at least in northern schools. In my case, I had no more than three black teachers throughout primary and secondary school.

    Starting in the 1960s, the values that made for civility came under attack. Corporal punishment was banned. This was the time when the education establishment and liberals launched their agenda that undermined lessons children learned from their parents and the church.

    We have replaced what worked with what sounds good.

    Sex education classes undermined family/church strictures against premarital sex. Lessons of abstinence were ridiculed, considered passé, and replaced with lessons about condoms, birth control pills, and abortion. Further undermining of parental authority came with legal and extralegal measures to assist teenage abortions, often with neither parental knowledge nor parental consent.

    Customs, traditions, moral values, and rules of etiquette are behavioral norms, transmitted mostly by example, word of mouth, and religious teachings. As such, they represent a body of wisdom distilled through the ages by experience and trial and error.

    The nation’s liberals—along with the education establishment, pseudo-intellectuals, and the courts—have waged war on traditions, customs and moral values. Many people have been counseled to believe that there are no moral absolutes. Instead, what’s moral or immoral is a matter of personal convenience, personal opinion, what feels good, or what is or is not criminal.

    We no longer condemn or shame self-destructive and rude behavior, such as out-of-wedlock pregnancies, dependency, cheating, and lying. We have replaced what worked with what sounds good.

    The abandonment of traditional values has negatively affected the nation as a whole, but blacks have borne the greater burden. This is seen by the decline in the percentage of black two-parent families. Today, a little over 30 percent of black children live in an intact family, where as early as the late 1800s, over 70 percent did. Black illegitimacy in 1938 was 11 percent, and that for whites was 3 percent. Today, it’s respectively 73 percent and 30 percent.

    It is the height of dishonesty, as far as blacks are concerned, to blame our problems on slavery, how white people behave, and racial discrimination. If those lies are not exposed, we will continue to look for external solutions when true solutions are internal. Those of us who are old enough to know better need to expose these lies.