SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (956520)8/13/2016 7:27:50 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574679
 
as long as you take in to account the fact that actual income isn't reduces as much as a static projection would suggest.

And what would that amount be? There have been several states which have used dynamic scoring to project the income, post tax cuts. All of those projections have been wrong. Drastically wrong. The static projections were a lot closer.

It is almost as if the economic boost due to the tax cuts were almost nonexistent...



To: TimF who wrote (956520)8/14/2016 7:44:41 AM
From: Alighieri  Respond to of 1574679
 
The spending causes the deficit, tax income reduces it. So no you can't eliminate taxes, because you need something to reduce it.

Oh, i get it (actually I always did)...we should eliminate spending...then we wouldn't need taxes.

You know you just gave birth (again) to endless bickering...you could dissolve the union and still not resolve the differences.

I am out.

Al


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News