SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (80)12/31/1997 10:20:00 PM
From: George J. Tromp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2251
 
Happy New Year: You are the man Ed.!!! You are the man.
Thanks again., it formats great.
George



To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (80)12/31/1997 11:49:00 PM
From: Walt  Respond to of 2251
 
Great work Ed and to you, George and all HAPPY NEW YEAR
Diamonds in North America, 5 years ago few would have believed it and now we have dozens of diamond plays and several potential mines to chose from.
Hope 1998 is a prosperous year for all.
Regards Walt



To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (80)1/1/1998 12:25:00 PM
From: skelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2251
 
Happy Sparkling New Year To All:
ED:
Thanks for your wonderful post!!! I assume that you will update the chart on a regular basis . I look forward to each update as we all will be able to see what is going on at on glance. This will give us all a real good insight on the diamond story. thanks again for your work.
May I suggest that you add a column in front of % change to indicate the price at Jan 1. This column would not change. Just a thought.
George :
in your post where you evaluate what your target is for 1998 are you basing your target price on what each company presently has or are you including what each might come up with during the next 12 months? For example would your target price of $8.50 for mpv change if 4 more pipes were to be discovered this year? and what if the bulk samples on the 4 existing pipes prove to be at least as good as the initial samples ? On what basis do you calculate your figures?
TIA
Cheers
skelly