SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (71624)8/23/2016 8:46:39 AM
From: Eric  Respond to of 86350
 


Danny Westneat / Columnist

Watching ice melt for 33 years, scientist finds glaciers are dying at anything but a glacial pace

Originally published August 19, 2016 at 9:37 pm Updated August 20, 2016 at 9:08 am


Glaciologist Mauri Pelto pours dye into a stream in 2015 to measure glacial runoff. He’s been monitoring the glaciers every summer since 1984. (Sy Bean / The Seattle Times, 2015)

Mauri Pelto volunteered at age 22 to audit our glaciers — for the next 50 years. He just finished year 33, and his data set has become a prime exhibit in the climate-change wars.

Mauri Pelto certainly didn’t set out to be a chronicler of loss.

He’s an environmental scientist, trained to study ecosystems and life. So when he volunteered for an extraordinary lifelong project at the idealistic age of 22, he had no idea he would become a sort of town crier of decline.

“I didn’t anticipate I would ever be seeing this level of demise,” is how he puts it.

Pelto just finished a 17-day audit of the glaciers of the North Cascades, a job he has done every summer since 1984 (“from President Reagan to President Obama,” he says.) He volunteered when the National Academy of Sciences put out a call in the early 1980s for someone to monitor glacial change. A student in Idaho at the time, he figured, “Hey, that’s something I could do.”

Related story

‘Disastrous’: Low snow, heat eat away at Northwest glaciers (September 2015)

What actually happened was hardly so flippant: Pelto pledged to walk the same Cascade glaciers for 50 consecutive years. The task was to measure the thickness of the ice, the water outflows and the distances the glaciers had moved. What mattered was the big picture, so it was crucial that he stick to it, and do it year after year.

On Tuesday this past week, he finished year number 33.

For the first couple decades, it was old-fashioned scientific legwork in almost total obscurity. Our glaciers were losing mass in total, and had been for decades though at relatively slow rates. But then around the late 1990s, it all took off.

The past three years, the rates of loss have been off the charts. Some glaciers have lost nearly 20 percent of their volume just since 2014, Pelto says. In total since he started, the glaciers have lost up to a third of what was there in 1984 — an average of 65 feet of thickness gone across all the North Cascades glaciers.

According to National Park Service geologist Jon Riedel, this is equivalent to a 100-year supply of stored water for the Skagit Valley, gone.

Pelto eventually became a professor at tiny Nichols College in Massachusetts, but he comes back every summer to audit the ice. What’s fascinating is how his steady, incremental work has become a sort of canary in the coal mine. He isn’t studying climate change directly (he’s not a climatologist). But over time, his chronicling of the acceleration of glacial melt has become a prime exhibit for what’s happening out on the ground.

“The fight about climate change is over, it seems to me,” Pelto says. “I don’t get anywhere near the pushback about whether it’s happening that I used to.”

Of the glaciers he’s monitoring, Pelto says Columbia Glacier, north of Skykomish near Glacier Peak, is melting so fast it’s likely doomed. He’s seen half a dozen smaller, low-elevation glaciers die since he started.

Overall, our glaciers lost 5 to 10 percent of their volume last year alone — the largest one-year loss measured. This year it’s about a 3 to 5 percent loss. The last time the glaciers gained appreciable ice volume was 2011. They have lost volume in 23 of the years Pelto has been auditing them and gained it in 10. But the losses have overwhelmed the gains by more than seven to one.

“There’s something unnatural happening,” Pelto says.

I asked Pelto what it’s been like to painstakingly compile all this numerical and visual evidence, for 33 years, yet during that same time have the political system often mock that any change is happening at all.

Example: Donald Trump, who now is one step away from the presidency, once famously tweeted the following: “I’m in Los Angeles and it’s freezing. Global warming is a total, and very expensive, hoax!”

Pelto said the know-nothing aspect of it is frustrating, but he’s got an outlet. Namely, he’s got 17 more years to walk the glaciers.

“They’re changing so fast now,” he said. “On one level it’s sad, because it isn’t an improvement to the ecosystem. But it definitely feels more vital than ever just to document it.”

The phrase “moving at a glacial pace” is supposed to mean going slow. But now the glaciers are moving faster than we are.

seattletimes.com

Danny Westneat’s column appears Wednesday and Sunday. Reach him at 206-464-2086 or dwestneat@seattletimes.com



To: Brumar89 who wrote (71624)8/23/2016 8:54:10 AM
From: Eric  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86350
 
Climate change
Climate Consensus - the 97%

Historical documents reveal Arctic sea ice is disappearing at record speed

Summer Arctic sea ice is at its lowest since records began over 125 years ago


The 2015 Arctic sea ice summertime minimum (699,000 square miles below the 1981-2010 average) is seen in a NASA visual representation of satellite data. Photograph: NASA/REUTERS

Dana Nuccitelli

Monday 22 August 2016 11.00 BST Last modified on Monday 22 August 2016 11.01 BST

Scientists have pieced together historical records to reconstruct Arctic sea ice extent over the past 125 years. The results are shown in the figure below. The red line, showing the extent at the end of the summer melt season, is the most critical:



Time series of Arctic sea ice extent, 1850-2013, for March (blue line) and September (red line). Illustration: Walsh et al. (2016)

Arctic sea ice extent in recent years is by far the lowest it’s been, with about half of the historical coverage gone, and the decline the fastest it’s been in recorded history. Florence Fetterer, principal investigator at the National Snow and Ice Data Center, described the data reconstruction process in a guest post at Carbon Brief:

Prof John Walsh, now at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and Dr Mick Kelly, from the University of East Anglia (now retired), were pioneers at retrieving data. They hand-digitised information from sources, such as aerial surveys, from the US Navy and UK Meteorological Office, and from the Danish Meteorological Institute’s yearbook maps (see examples from 1978 and 1979 – both pdfs).

Walsh, along with Prof William Chapman from University of Illinois, used these various sources to make monthly grids in Arctic and Southern Ocean sea ice concentrations, covering the period 1901-95.

However, as Fetterer explains, gaps remained in their records, which have now been filled into the NSIDC dataset using a variety of sources:
  • The sea ice edge positions in the North Atlantic, between 1850 and 1978, derived from various sources, including newspapers, ship observations, aircraft observations, diaries and more.
  • Sea ice concentration data from regular aerial surveys of ice in the eastern Arctic by the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia, beginning in 1933.
  • Sea ice edge positions for Newfoundland and the Canadian Maritime Region from observations, for 1870 to 1962.
  • Detailed charts of ice in the waters around Alaska for 1954 to 1978, originally the property of a consulting firm (the Dehn collection).
  • Arctic-wide maps of ice cover from the Danish Meteorological Institute from 1901 to 1956.


A Danish Meteorological Institute ice chart for August, 1926. The red symbols mark the location of observations recorded in ship logbooks. Illustration: Walsh et al. (2016).

It’s not just the area of ice-covered ocean that’s shrunk; in fact, the volume of Arctic sea ice has declined even faster. As illustrated in this video created by Andy Lee Robinson, about two-thirds of the summer sea ice has disappeared in just 36 years as the warming oceans have thinned the ice.

Arctic Sea Ice Minimum Volumes 1979-2015

youtube.com

Annual minimum Arctic sea ice volume 1979–2015, created by Andy Lee Robinson. Previous research has also shown that Arctic sea ice is at its lowest level in at least 1,450 years, and the recent decline is mostly due to human-caused global warming.

This dramatic change may be causing ripple effects throughout the Earth’s climate system. For example, some research has suggested a possible connection between the Arctic sea ice decline and the intensity of California’s recent record drought (although the connection is not definitive). Those record drought conditions in turn contributed to the intense wildfires currently raging across California. Other research has suggested possible connections between disappearing Arctic sea ice and extreme weather events, but again, these connections aren’t yet definitive.

The loss of ice causes what scientists call a feedback effect. Ice is highly reflective, while the ocean beneath is dark. When the ice on the ocean surface melts, the Arctic becomes less reflective and absorbs more sunlight, causing it to warm faster, melting more ice, causing more warming, and so on. This feedback is one of the main reasons why the Arctic is Earth’s fastest-warming region, with temperatures rising about twice as fast as in lower latitudes.

Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius predicted this Arctic amplification effect in 1896. As a result, the Arctic is effectively the ‘canary in the coal mine’ of the Earth’s climate, showing us the dramatic effects human-caused global warming can have on the climate system. The signal is clear, but the question remains whether we’ll take action, or stay in the coal mine.

theguardian.com