Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (29559)	1/1/1998 10:28:00 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

<<..Why don't you try E-mailing Zeev and asking him how he feels about us and you might learn something. He and I have been communicating for a year now and are continueing to do so. I was one of the people he asked to be a potential investor. Strange action IMO for someone that sooo abused. The more I talk the more I am wrong and the more I am wrong the more I learn. If you wish to condemn people for their postings then condemn me and leave everyone else out of it..>> Befor you start posting more out of context post ...please do so with the UNDERSTANDING that us posters have mostly lost lots with this fiasco, and that has hurt many in many different ways. The positiveness of the past was just that, uncautioned, non-proper investing. Yes, you and others ( CC, Zeev, and countless others( Dennis, O.H., Jody, gads the list of my Thread Friends Warners are endless), even EC gave us a chance to reconsider the BALANCE ) and guess what; we didn't ..in general. That was then, this is now. Now, is the time to heal or be a heel, it is your choice! Thank you all for this indulgence. Yes, I wrote a letter of support for Zeev. I think I almost made the same transgression as he did, what ever that was! Atleast we ( Zeev and I ) joked about that the other day! Chucaupt2(stilllong also at these Desert Dirts!)

To: go4it who wrote (29559)	1/1/1998 12:23:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Chuck, I think that in the past, some of those that had doubt about IPMCF's valuation and even their management ability to get the this play off the ground have been maligned. Yet in time we got to learn each other side's positions. I personally do not consider verbal pugilism on a personal level fruitful, so I have tried to avoid it as much as possible (even after dear Anne offered me the nuce (g) or was it someone else?). In any event, Jim has been called quite a number of derogatory names on this thread and one must admit that to some extension, the position he took at the time was more reflective of the IPMCF state than many other. I think that the hatychet should be burried and that discourse should be limited to facts, point of view on facts and opinions as well as speculations, but personal characterization of posters (and character assassination) should be left out. I would like to take the opportunity to thank all those on this thread, many of wehich have disagreed with my position vehemently in the past, for voicing your concern and requesting the reinstatement of my posting privileges on SI. Thank you and have a prosperous and happy new year. Zeev