Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neeka who wrote (606131)	8/26/2016 1:54:03 PM
From: bruwin	2 Recommendations Recommended By LindyBill Neeka Respond to of 793896

There's no doubt that Bill was a womanizer and adulterer par excellence ... that, I would say, is VERY common knowledge. However, I wouldn't say that it is an effective weapon to use against Hilary. Trump, in my opinion, should attack her on the lack of actual physical support and attendance that she's getting at her public meetings, compared to his own numbers, despite the so-called "evidence(?)" of the manufactured Polls. He should also be attacking her on her collaboration, together with her husband, in the Clinton Foundation's reaping in of vast amounts of money, primarily for lining their own pockets. He should be highlighting the fact that when she was appointed Secretary of State, she and her husband undertook to make clear and transparent ANY contribution made to their Foundation, ESPECIALLY if it came from another foreign government, because of how that could possibly harm the Obama administration. But due, I believe, to the massive Egos and Arrogance of those two Clintons, they haven't generally complied with that donor transparency ... no doubt for good reason. In addition, Trump should also show her up for what she did while she was Sec. of State, where she used her governmental position to often clear the way for her husband's dealings with numerous very shady characters. And then, of course, there are the emails and the server and the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange's, ongoing supply of information regarding Ms. Clinton's very shady past and abuse of her government office ..... That's where, IMO, Trump should be spending a fair amount of his public appearance in showing up Hilary for what she is, based on what she's done, AND to continue to ask the American public if that is the sort of individual that the American people would wish to have in the top office in the land .....

To: Neeka who wrote (606131)	8/26/2016 2:13:03 PM
From: bruwin	Respond to of 793896

There's no doubt that Bill was a womanizer and adulterer par excellence ... that, I would say, is VERY common knowledge. However, I wouldn't say that it is an effective weapon to use against Hilary. Trump, in my opinion, should attack her on the lack of actual physical support and attendance that she's getting at her public meetings, compared to his own numbers, despite the so-called "evidence(?)" of the manufactured Polls. That shows up both what lack of support that she is actually receiving, plus showing up the sham of those manipulated Polls and their distinct lack of real relevance. As well as showing up the MSM for who they actually are and their irrelevance in the real world of America's general population. He should also be attacking her on her collaboration, together with her husband, in the Clinton Foundation's reaping in of vast amounts of money, primarily for lining their own pockets. He should be highlighting the fact that when she was appointed Secretary of State, she and her husband undertook to make clear and transparent ANY contribution made to their Foundation, ESPECIALLY if it came from another foreign government, because of how that could possibly harm the Obama administration. But due, I believe, to the massive Egos and Arrogance of those two Clintons, they haven't generally complied with that donor transparency ... no doubt for good reason. In addition, Trump should also show her up for what she did while she was Sec. of State, where she used her governmental position to often clear the way for her husband's dealings with numerous very shady characters. And then, of course, there are the emails and the server and the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange's, ongoing supply of information regarding Ms. Clinton's very shady past and abuse of her government office ..... That's where, IMO, Trump should be spending a fair amount of his public appearance in showing up Hilary for what she is, based on what she's done, AND to continue to ask the American public if that is the sort of individual that the American people would wish to have in the top office in the land .....

To: Neeka who wrote (606131)	8/26/2016 4:35:41 PM
From: bruwin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793896

.... and if Hilary Clinton undoubtedly comes up with a string of denials about Trump's accusations which will, to a large extent, be based on the writings of Schweizer and D'Souza, Trump should then ask her why she has never issued writs against the two authors for Slander or Defamation of Character, etc, etc ..... It would be interesting to hear what she has to say to that one if she is as "squeaky clean" as she would like all and sundry to believe .... And Trump should also continually hammer the phrase ... "Where there's smoke there's fire", and in so doing create more and more doubt about Hilary's integrity and suitability in the minds of the voters.