Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (959651)	8/27/2016 9:59:27 AM
From: combjelly	1 Recommendation Recommended By zax Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577143

Texas has highest maternal mortality rate in developed world, study finds[Molly Redden/The Guardian] It has been worth it, though. Because Texas has a laser-like focus on maternal healthcare, we have had to shut down most of the clinics who were doing abortions. If it hadn't of been for that, who knows what the maternal mortality rate would have been? Maternal healthcare is one of the most important things on the state legislature's mind. Just ask them...

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (959651)	8/27/2016 11:53:05 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1577143

That's one of those stories that are intentionally misleading and made up to purely to fulfill liberals views of how the world should be. If you restrict abortion in any way whatsoever, you're going to persecute women. Because maternity is a curse, an evil thing to be surpressed by killing the dangerous parasitic babies that infest women's bodies. Every liberal knows this. Now if you have more births, more maternity per 100,000 population, you're also going to have more maternal deaths per 100,000 population. Simply because you have more pregnant women. If even a few of them die - and a few of everyone dies every year, those are maternal deaths. But if you kill more babies in the womb, then you have fewer births, less maternity, and fewer maternal deaths per 100,000 population. Because you have fewer pregnant women. So if young women die - and a few of everyone dies every year, they're not maternal deaths. Why don't they write about California's ruthless war on babies in the womb? And why do Democrats hate babies so much?