To: Spekulatius who wrote (57893 ) 8/28/2016 12:34:59 PM From: Graham Osborn Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78748 Thanks for that info. As with many things, different people have different definitions of rollup. Some people would require a certain number of acquisitions per year, or a certain EV CAGR, or whatever. From my perspective they've taken on incremental debt to grow revenue and eaten into their tangible book to do it (my "death triad," although the monicker is perhaps overaggressive). I think of an acquisition as "digested" when the debt taken on has been paid off from FCF, ideally from the new operating unit itself. For me, "organic growth" mean FCF before acquisitions is sufficient to cover expansion with leftover retained earnings (good examples would be GOOGL, WMT. I look for sustained increase in tangible book, working capital, and current assets/ net current assets. That said, one could argue I've missed some great stock success stories by foregoing some aggressive acquirers. The challenge in investing is that some of the greatest profits can be made by relaxing one's principles, but such processes are inherently self-limiting. You can be a prude like Graham and ignore such opportunities entirely, or you can be an opportunist like Buffett or Soros and try to buy early into a trend. Given that I think we are late in the debt cycle, I am forgoing opportunities regularly so as not to get caught in a downdraft. That I may miss an updraft is possible too, hence my recent tech purchases. It blows my mind how easily GOOGL could double their revenue simply by bringing their D/ E up to the Fortune 500 average. Not saying that would be prudent, but it seems that is what investors want (or buybacks/ dividends).