SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jean sutherland who wrote (23806)1/1/1998 1:26:00 PM
From: Hairy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41046
 
Jean not all things go as planned, if they did you yourself would have made money on this stock. Why are you badgering people? I don't understand why you are doing this. I've done nothing to you or the stocks you believe in. On the other hand I feel that you are stomping on sacred ground , I have hard earned money in this stock, you seem to be insensitive to that. I don't know your goals, if you have hard evedience against this company, it is fine to let me and other people know, but I see you bashing the stock with little or no credence at all. Please quit doing this. Thankyou



To: jean sutherland who wrote (23806)1/1/1998 2:58:00 PM
From: jim bowman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41046
 
Hey all, visualize this: The police dispacher's reaction when Jean shows up on the door step with a floppy of her "obscene e-mails", while trying to describe SI, her participation and resulting "problems" -- on New Years Eve.



To: jean sutherland who wrote (23806)1/1/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: David McCleary  Respond to of 41046
 
Jean, in my opinion the reason the price has fallen is twofold, neither of which suggests Frank is a liar in any way. First, as much as many on this board hate the word, FUNDAMENTALS simply could not justify such an inflated price. I and a few others saw $3.50 as a point which could be supported by fundamentals and up to now it has. Second, many were told either first hand or second hand that the end of the S1 process would bring "great and exciting news" that hadn't been legal to discuss up to that time. Well, we haven't heard anything yet. This I am sure has ticked off many who bought for that sole reason and lead them to sell. I don't know the reason for this delay in the promised news, but I doubt Mr. Peters would have said anything to see short term gains during the quiet period at the sacrafice of long term gains. I've been in this stock a long time, and rarely if ever is FTEL "on time" with news, but usually it seems to come EVENTUALLY!
By the way, the extension on the trial periods should be over today, looking forward to seeing if any sales are made.
Dave (Holding the Faith!)



To: jean sutherland who wrote (23806)1/1/1998 3:13:00 PM
From: Martin P. Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41046
 
Jean, Thank-you for the cogent well reasoned response. I must however take great offense at your implication reproduced below.

" btw got some more obscene emails for my views, so passed them along to law enforcment and you been WARNED"

By using the personal pronoun YOU, you Jean Sutherland are implying, in public, that you suspect ME of sending these obsence emails to you. This is clearly a libelous statement.

Martin Smith