Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TA-HARD & SOFTWARE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Donnie Miracle Jr who wrote (138)	1/1/1998 11:52:00 AM
From: gonzongo	Respond to of 163

Thanks Donnie- I will check out SYquest thread. Price is not announced but should still be cheaper than competition. Release date- I hope 2-98.. but I don't know as am just a user. andy

To: Donnie Miracle Jr who wrote (138)	1/1/1998 12:30:00 PM
From: Liam Kingsmill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 163

QuotesPlus R1 faster with two drives? I recall Gary Lyben's remark that the speed advantage of two drives was from reducing disk head movement. Do I recall correctly? Now, the simple implication, if that is true, is that R1 would be faster with data on a second drive. However, some further deep thought touches on how wonderfully the two drives might cooperate. Is one an older, slower that sets the transfer for both to its own slower rate, for just one complication. I'm not very astute in these (or any other matters) so, probably much else also complicates the formula to compute any end result.