Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jack Clarke who wrote (14571)	1/1/1998 1:47:00 PM
From: MSB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

<<Neither of these reasons is any excuse why justice should not have been done under the law, which it was not.>> With all due respect, justice was done according to our judicial system. Each defendant has the right to a jury trial by his peers in this type of criminal case. The jury acquited the defendant. Therefore, justice was done. Whether we agree with their decision is besides the point. Otherwise, defendants would be subjected to a trial over and over until the majority got the justice they wanted which, in my opinion, smacks of vigilantyism (I apologize for the spelling errors.) I'm of the opinion that all those involved in the Waco debacle should have been jailed, bailed, and tried by a jury of their peers as well, but we all know what happened there. Obviously, justice is NOT for all. I'm tempted to make the comment that the peers of the defendant in the Denny trial can't even tell each other apart, but I'll decline lest I be labled a racist. I'm a separatist; I believe there IS a difference.