Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zax who wrote (960906)	9/2/2016 6:49:28 AM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1575424

what a joke network ESPN Speaker Apologizes for Saying America Does Not Oppress Blacks 8 truthrevolt

To: zax who wrote (960906)

9/2/2016 10:23:51 AM

From: locogringo

2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Old Boothby

Respond to of 1575424

Will the scumbag lying freaks of nature on this thread offer an apology and retraction:

Melania Trump: A retraction

On August 20, 2016, an article was published in the Daily Mail newspaper titled ´Racy photos, and troubling questions about his wife´s past that could derail Trump.´ The article discussed whether allegations being made about Melania Trump could negatively affect her husband Donald Trump´s presidential bid. Among other things, the article noted that allegations have been made in a book available on Amazon about a modeling agency where Mrs. Trump worked in Milan being ´something like a gentleman´s club,´ and an article published by Suzy, a Slovenian magazine, alleged that Mrs. Trump´s modeling agency in New York, run by Paolo Zampolli...

To the contrary, The Daily Mail newspaper article stated that there was no support for the allegations, and it provided adamant denials from Mrs. Trump's spokesperson and from Mr. Zampolli.

To the extent that anything in the Daily Mail's article was interpreted as stating or suggesting that Mrs. Trump worked as an 'escort' or in the 'sex business,' that she had a 'composite or presentation card for the sex business,' or that either of the modeling agencies referenced in the article were engaged in these businesses, it is hereby retracted, and the Daily Mail newspaper regrets any such misinterpretation.

Original Article