SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Income Taxes and Record Keeping ( tax ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Colin Cody who wrote (369)1/2/1998 1:08:00 AM
From: Brendan W  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5810
 
Colin, early in this thread one of the resident experts intimated that you can not use specific identification to sell a higher basis lot that resides in another account. I am referring to a situation where you have 100 IBM shares with Merrill Lynch for which you paid $100 a share and 100 IBM shares with Schwab for which you paid $50 a share and you want to sell out of the Schwab account because of lower commissions, margin requirements, etc.

I believe it was "Nasty P" that intimated this. Are there cites to back this up? This seems unreasonable to me as I doubt the IRS would let you apply the FIFO only within the account.

Also, in reply "200" Zeuspaul references an IRS publication that seems to contradict this:
>>>>>>
Stock identified this way is the stock sold or transferred even if stock certificates from a different lot are delivered to the broker or other agent.
<<<<<<

Thank you SO much for your replies (and the other experts) on this thread ... I went back and read them all. I hope you guys are getting referrals out of this or something...



To: Colin Cody who wrote (369)1/2/1998 9:15:00 PM
From: Bruce Hoyt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5810
 
Hi Colin, I apologize if you have already answered this one but if so I missed it. Concerning wash sales. Scenerio: Someone sells stock ABCD at a loss on December 22 and rebuys same stock on January 8. Since the two transactions are unrelated except for the wash rule and will be reported in two different tax years, it seems unlikely the IRS would catch it if the taxpayer ignored the wash sale rule. Your opinion on this highly theoretical event?

Bruce