SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A Hard Look At Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (4599)9/3/2016 3:11:38 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 47011
 
Media Giant Rupert Murdoch: Roger Ailes Made Trump

Posted at 9:30 am on September 3, 2016 by Susan Wright



Most of us have already put the puzzle pieces together on this one. It didn’t take much, actually. However, media titan, Rupert Murdoch, is substantiating everything those of us who have remained uninfected by the cancer of Trumpism have been saying.

Ailes and the Republican presidential nominee are longtime friends. The sources said Ailes, who founded Fox in 1996, gave Trump a weekly call-in segment on Fox & Friends to discuss political issues, including the widely debunked “birther” myth he helped perpetuate against Barack Obama—that the president was not born in the United States.

Sources close to Ailes and Trump told the magazine that the former media executive had lunch with the real estate mogul shortly before he announced his White House bid, and continued to give him political advice throughout the primary season.



The rumor coming out of this is that it was Murdoch who wanted the Fox News anchors to go hard at Trump during the first debate in August 2015. Of course, Trump went full diaper-baby at being treated like a candidate for the presidency, and so began the feud between Trump and Megyn Kelly.

The relationship between Murdoch and Ailes allegedly became “strained” because Murdoch didn’t approve of the perception that Ailes was allowing Fox News to back Trump, New York magazine reported. Then, in early June, former Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson sued Ailes, claiming sexual harassment. Carlson, who had worked at Fox News for more than a decade, alleges that Ailes fired her in June because she had refused his sexual advances.

So it seems Murdoch actually wanted Fox News to be a news network, while Ailes wanted it to be Trump’s campaign headquarters and a swinger’s hangout.

Since Ailes’ ousting at the network, Murdoch took over the duties as CEO and chairman of Fox News, while Ailes slithered over to Trump’s camp as an adviser.

One more disreputable cad in a stable of scummy guys.

Can Fox News ever regain the legitimacy it has lost in the eyes of so many, who were once loyal viewers (like myself)? I'm sure it can, but it's going to require a thorough house cleaning, which means dumping some of the current members of the Reich Ministry that have been passed off as serious commentators and newsmen.

The feckless acquiescence of men like Sean Hannity and Eric Bolling will leave a stench on the name of Fox for years to come. Ideally, they should have been swept out with Ailes, sent to be coffee fetchers and house entertainment for the Trump campaign.

Until that happens, however, Fox will have to ride out this campaign season with hopes of hitting the reset button afterwards.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (4599)9/4/2016 1:26:53 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 47011
 
ENSOFTENING: Top Trump Surrogate Ben Carson Outlines Alternative to Mexico Paying for the Wall

Posted at 7:30 am on September 4, 2016 by Caleb Howe

Donald Trump can't stop waffling on his wall, or on his immigration policies as a whole. This week, the question of Mexico paying has been a hot one. From Trump's denial that it came up in Mexico, to the Mexican President stating unequivocally that he told Trump Mexico would not pay, to Trump's speech where he said they don't know it, but they darn sure will, it's been typical Trumpian absurdity.

We've told you several times already the ways in which Trump is using carefully ambiguous language to dupe his fans by claiming Mexico is going to pay for a big, physical wall, all the while leaving himself options to not do that. And his surrogates have let it slip for months. The latest such slip comes from one his most important surrogates, former rival Dr. Ben Carson.

From Fox News:
Speaking with Fox News, Carson said money saved from enforcing the border could be used – though he did not elaborate on what level of savings the federal government could expect, particularly when Trump is proposing spending more money on border security resources.

“Recognize that a lot of money is going to be saved by enforcing our borders, by not, you know, giving various types of benefits to people who are here illegally,” Carson said. “That money is money that we otherwise would not have had and that can be applied to the wall and various other things. That’s I believe the spirit in which that comment is made. I don't think Mexico is going to write a check out and say here, pay for the wall.”

Saved or created money. That sounds like how President Obama counts job numbers. It's mealy-mouthed politician talk for "well they aren't actually going to pay for it."

Using money that we save by not spending it on the border isn't having someone else pay for it. That's still our money. That's like thinking that buying something on sale puts money in your pocket. You're still spending the money. He's talking about allocating funds to the wall that were previously allocated to enforcement. It's not money we "otherwise would not have had" it's money we do have and were spending.

Lifezette, run by Trumbot Laura Ingraham, also reported "alternative" payment ideas, such as using seized cartel assets.

To fund construction of a new U.S. border wall, Donald Trump and senior advisers are considering various ideas, including the use of assets seized from drug cartels and others in the illicit drug trade.

As the debate over who will pay for the wall dominates the discussion on cable news, sources involved in the pre-planning of the GOP nominee’s Mexico trip told LifeZette the Trump camp is looking for innovative ways to pay for the construction of the border wall — ways that both countries can support. Sensitivities in Mexico regarding Trump’s visit, and specifically paying for the border wall, are running high.

A fine idea. But not the idea Trump sold during the primaries. It's not even the idea he sold in his speech this week. Trump has conjured in the minds of his base an image of Mexico crawling on its knees with a check in hand. Vengeance for terkinerrjerbs. He's sold that idea this entire campaign. But like most of what he sells, both politically and commercially, it's not what the customer expected, wanted, or was told.

In other words, told you so.