SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (36030)10/30/2016 12:22:48 AM
From: James Seagrove  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 36917
 
"The Kyoto Protocol is a political solution to a non-existent problem without scientific justification.”

The Koran is banned in Angola and not popular in Slovakia. I'm surprised a book from the 7th century is taken as a direct revelation and not a simple guide of popular maxims that enrich the common good such as render unto Caesar or turn the other cheek.

The book councils and propels its adherents to kill as a lifestyle choice.

Every western history book portrays the Crusades as an offensive war. Long before any Crusader ever made it to the Holy Land - Islam had penetrated as far north as France.

Moslems need to rewrite their book or better yet pick a different book. I would suggest Les Miserables a story with good morals and values. Of course Muslims would be incensed by my suggestion because they believe the book is a direct revelation. They don't realize this revelation was written in a script that no longer exists with countless edits and revisions getting more bloodthirsty with every rewrite. en.m.wikipedia.org

The most important reason to ban the book is it does not believe in separation of church and state and therefore incompatible with western values. Islam has a lot in common with a fledgling new religion called "global warming" that is trying to combine a belief system with government legislation financed by citizen slaves. I suppose if I had to pick between the two faiths I would follow Mohammed. The promises are good and the loot better. Mohammed only requires I accept a magical being called Allah on faith which is a lot easier to swallow than accepting science on faith.



To: Sun Tzu who wrote (36030)1/25/2018 2:50:56 PM
From: Elmer Flugum  Respond to of 36917
 
Meet the vegans having better sex than you

“The Game Changers” is the latest of several documentaries that aim to convert men to plant-based diets

1843magazine.com

Can going vegan improve your sex life? Yes it can, says “The Game Changers”, a new documentary backed by James Cameron that portrays plant-based diets as the height of cool. Forget scrawny celery-munchers, the vegan sportsmen profiled here are superhumanly strong, ripped and – yes – having awesome sex. Three college athletes wear machines that measure their night-time erections, and discover they are both longer and fuller after a no-animal meal. “So really, the guy eating the big steak is soft?” says one, processing the revelation. All resolve to go vegan on future dates.

If you thought veganism was all about saving animals and stopping global warming, you’re hopelessly old-fashioned. The new brand of macho veganism promoted by “The Game Changers”, which is fronted by a mixed-martial-arts fighter called James Wilks, is essentially amoral. Wilks took up the diet for health reasons: while out with an injury, he read a study that claimed that Roman gladiators ate little to no meat. It’s a similar narrative to “From the Ground Up”, a documentary which came out last year that followed Santino Panico, an American-football player, as he sought to improve his performance with the help of a plant-based diet. Also released last year was the controversial Netflix shock-doc “What the Health”, which concluded its investigation into the dangers of eating meat and dairy (sample dubious claim: eating one egg a day is as bad as smoking five cigarettes) with a montage of elite athletes using veganism to “heal injuries, speed recovery times and enhance their performance”.

If there are health benefits to veganism, it is a more complicated story than the one presented by these evangelical films, which are an unscientific mix of personal anecdote, cherry-picked expert testimony and – with surprising frequency – archaeology. We do not hear any dissenting voices, and the film-makers gloss over the hard work that goes in to maintaining a healthy high-calorie diet. Sure, call-to-action documentaries are not known for editorial balance. But what’s striking is how the means of persuasion have changed. Traditional pro-veganism films, like “Cowspiracy” (2014) and “Earthlings” (2005), with their focus on global conspiracies against animal-rights activists and their relentless footage of slaughterhouse gore, could be mistaken for horror movies. In these new documentaries the message has been attractively repackaged: eat sprouts, sprout a six pack!

This is pragmatic activism. James Cameron is really an old-fashioned sort of vegan: he talks about carbon footprints, water footprints and moral responsibility. But the man behind “Titanic” and “Avatar” still has a nose for the zeitgeist. This is the age of online influencers, and all ideas must now do battle in a highly visual economy. Veganism is on the up among the young and urban, and they have not been converted by gruesome pamphlets about battery-cage chickens. It was no accident that when The Vegan Society reported that the number of vegans in Britain had increased by 360% in the decade leading up to 2016, it described it as a “lifestyle movement”. Hygge is a lifestyle movement. So is minimalism. Veganism – once considered extreme, even by its advocates – has found its way in from the cold.

Only a nutritional luddite would argue with the idea that we should eat less meat. But there’s something about these new documentaries that feels itchingly familiar. Over and over, they tell of miraculous transformations – like David Carter, the ex-NFL lineman whose tendonitis and high blood pressure vanished when he switched his diet, and ultra-endurance athlete Rich Roll, who used to struggle climbing the stairs but now feels “like a 20-year-old” despite being born in 1965. Many women will recognise these sorts of stories from a few years back, when the “clean eating” movement, driven by social media, was at its height. Anthony Warner, a food writer who was sceptical about clean eating, laid out what he described as the “health blogger template”: the identikit stories of glamorous young women who had improved their health through diets that centred on eating un-processed foods. Clean eating fell out of fashion as a consensus grew that it was selling women fad diets by another name, and often masking eating disorders.

Wavering omnivores after food for thought are better off turning to fiction. “Carnage” (2017), directed by Simon Amstell, is a witty, never preachy mockumentary set in a near-future Britain where everyone is vegan and feels terribly guilty about their carnivorous past. There’s also “Ojka”, a Korean fantasy film released last year, which tells the story of a giant pig born in a lab and raised for slaughter. The activists trying to free Okja are often ridiculous, and their actions riddled with the contradictions that characterise all attempts at puritanism (one of them refuses to eat because “all food is exploitation”, making him a faint-prone liability on missions). As Jon Ronson, who co-wrote the script, explained in an interview: “I always find it a bit of a turnoff when you make the heroic people just so heroic.” If you’ve watched a documentary featuring men in gym vests with slogans like “vegan badass” and “vaggressive”, you’ll know what he means.