SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donald Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (12980)9/8/2016 10:59:14 AM
From: Fintas1 Recommendation

Recommended By
toccodolce

  Respond to of 74332
 
HAWK...Thanks for the input.

The responsible and I mean the responsible as in leaders need to step up and tell the truth rather than give her cover.

Now let's keep in mind as many of her supporters state she has x million miles of travelling here and there meeting dignitaries and others that she was doing such with those un protected devices.

And if you notice recently she's now changing her tune aka bullet points to the but when she did handle classified she did it using the appropriate server or hard copy.

THIS LAWYER like her husband continues to play games with truth and others ALLOW her to do so. Whether it be Leone Paneta wh claims she is the most experienced? SERIOUSLY LEONE.. The F/U she has made and as you worked with her are beyond belief. YOU TOO LEONE knew Benghazi was not about a video. U knew it was a terrorist act and yet you L PANETTA remained silent. So much for your credibility L. Panetta. So too many like Leone.

Now who was HILLARY SENDING those emails from that private server and devices that were NOT SECURE. Well we know Sidney Blumenthal.. We also know Obama..

How many others glanced at the emails to notice the emails were NOT sent from a govt server. That the information contained was classified.

Fact is marking or not.. those with knowledge would understand John 3:16 whether marked or not marked. Ditto secure information.

The women is dangerous! Those who run cover are dangerous. And I would have loved to have seen that individual with background who stated he would have been put in jail if he did what she did have been given a follow up to her bull chit response

I'd also have loved to hear STRONG FOLLOW up to bull chit responses from those using bullet points. Such as the FBI did not find..

Hello the FBI did not ask her specific questions. And although she does not have to LIE to the FBI to get into trouble.. How is it she was not recorded, there was no transcript of her WORDS.. she was not sworn in. WHO IS THIS PERSON? IS SHE ABOVE procedure?

And when another was asked this AM what he would do if under subpoena.. The fool.. And I do mean FOOL cuz he did the duck with the FBI had decided. The question A.H was would YOU destroy docs if you had been directed to produce and under subpoena?

IT is friggen time we stop the games played by the Clinton's with the LAW.

This is too serious and it's time WE THE PEOPLE stand up and call out those who give HILLARY COVER or ANY that break the law or were complicit with allowing C or TS documents to be able to be hacked or other from some dumb chit that was NOT qualified to be put in place because her AGENDA caused her to be extremely careless aka gross negligent.

That's my RANT this AM.. NOT directed at you but to SUPPORT your post and your background.

Fintas



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (12980)9/8/2016 8:55:37 PM
From: Ms. Baby Boomer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74332
 
Was IT also intentional to destroy 18 electronic devices with a hammer???

For what reason???

To protect this Country's National Security or cover her arse during course
of the FBI investigation???

Should IT be the former, then that is considered obstruction of justice....

M