Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : INVX Innovex Comdex Winner !! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gus who wrote (1969)	1/2/1998 1:11:00 AM
From: Mark Oliver	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3029

<Does this then make the battle HIF vs TSA vs Pico-cap?> Of course. There will always be challenges to face. I had heard about the Fujitsu method about a year ago when it was clear they were going to be a greater force in the enterprise niche. At the time, INVX said they supplied most of Fujitsu's programs except they had high end interconnects using a TSA like solution. He said at the time it cost about $3 to make. In a year, manufacturing know how can improve costs dramatically, but in the end it becomes a serious question of cost vs improved performance. I find the fact that Seagate would use HIF in their Cheetha product very telling. But, please let me know if you've heard more about whether Fujitsu has been supplying others, or even moved to Pico-cap for their entire product line. Do you have any word about cost? Do you believe them? Is it really better? Regards, Mark