SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Big Bucks who wrote (14026)1/1/1998 5:45:00 PM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Thanks for the link, Nice website!

suite101.com

I've bookmarked it.
What is your specialty/job at HP.


Thanks.

I design optical tranceivers. I did Fiberoptic tranceivers from '84 to '94 which are now being used in the internet. These days I design Infrared tranceivers found in printers and notebooks today and very soon cell phones, pagers and other personal "appliances". The idea is an IR link is cheaper and more reliable than a link thru a mechanical connector.

I think HP will have above avg returns for yrs to come and I get AMAT, UTEK, et al to "spice up" my portfolio.

regards
Kirk out

PS I Haardly consider AMAT "battered" considering my 67.7% return on it this yr. Sure, 135% or so would have been nicer, but I am not that greedy!



To: Big Bucks who wrote (14026)1/1/1998 8:07:00 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
BB,

In one of your posts, you mentioned your belief that AMAT would probably have a run to ~$40 by the end of January. In another post, you said you did not think AMAT would see levels above $41 for 1998. IYO, do you think there is a double-v as it were, a second downturn that could be as serious as the one in '96?

Personally, I think the DRAM market is weak. The 16MB lifespan was incredibly short and the 64MB looks like it will suffer a similar lifespan shortage. Other than the current wakness in DRAM, we should be poised for growth w/ the implementation of 300mm. Right now IMO, there is so much uncertainty that semis don't want to commit their precious capital at a time of shrinking margins. Sooner or later though, they will have to to remain competitive. The question is when. Are you betting that we will see a down year in capex? Specifically though, AMAT is notoriously srtong in all of the previous downturns and has come out of each owning greater and greater shares of an increasing number of markets. Are you skeptical AMAT can weather this storm and keep eps in line w/ mgt forecasts?

IMHO, all of the semis are waiting for a GO signal before they commit heavily in the new technologies. Also, none want to telegraph their intentions to their competitors. Bottom line IMO, is that once INTC, TXN etc. make the decision that there is sufficient market demand and the committment to 300mm is made, there will be a California-Gold-Rush mentality to the newer technology. Would appreciate any insight.

Regards,

Brian