Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TopCat who wrote (963588)	9/12/2016 7:53:33 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575005

Right now, I think her docs would say "atypical pneumonia of unknown etiology". They might have sputum cultures and blood work to determine the organism causing it. "have you seen her medical records?" Just the 2 page letter from her doc. "I'll assume you could properly interpret them" Prolly; I've read a lot of charts in my lifetime. It's not like I was working with raw data. Some of it's not that hard for people in the field. You don't have to read X-rays, cuz the radiologist notes will say, "Impression...X-rays show...". You don't have to know what all the numbers in a pulmonary function test mean, cuz there's a pulmonologist who tells you. "Flow and volume restrictions consistent with restrictive lung disease" You don't need to read EKGs, cuz the EKG machine prints out a preliminary diagnosis. Here are some hospital H&P's... history and physical exam med.unc.edu