Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zenyatta VS Canada Carbon Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GMPInvestor who wrote (482)	9/15/2016 7:00:26 PM
From: Fact Czecher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 603

GMPInvestor posted: "Fact Czexher do you think 7 years of testing is accurate or does the nuclear industry require longer? My understanding is 12-15 years of testing." GMP - does it really matter? If several facilities want to test the product, CCB will have about 1500 tonnes/per year to supply them starting in 2018. Once the product is purchased at an agreed upon price, I suspect CCB won't care if the purchaser is testing it, using it in their own process, producing graphene, or lining outhouses with it.

To: GMPInvestor who wrote (482)	9/16/2016 2:48:07 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 603

Your understanding is poor to non-existant. Testing of a new prototype of a baselined design is not as long as testing a new design. They have tested Pebble now for over 10 years. So the design is baselined scaling is now the approach. If you would stop repeating what others say and think and do some DD you would find your illustrous Lawyer buddy has not got one clue as to what he is talking about. The reason that they no longer have to test for Synthetic is because they have a standard for synthetic graphite. They now have a test for Natural, that test used our graphite. We obviously would pass the test and have. So now they use it in a scaled Nuke, not hard to understand if you actually think for a living.