SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greg nus who wrote (3330)1/1/1998 9:32:00 PM
From: StockMan  Respond to of 6843
 
Nus,
Re -- I thought to run windowns 95 you need at lest 32 M of ram?

No, 8 M is enough, with 16 M you can do most tasks very well. 32 M makes it go much faster, 64 M even much faster and so on... you get the point.

Stockman

P.S What's your estimate for AMD's losses this Q.



To: greg nus who wrote (3330)1/1/1998 9:41:00 PM
From: Investor A  Respond to of 6843
 
Greg,

Both systems could be installed with Win95. Win95 loves RAM. End users could pay CompUSA $60 to add more RAM. Unless they add more RAM into these systems, the poor Win95 users would give free advices towards everyone to skip from buying the slow systems with Intel Inside.

Sound great to me! :)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News