To: tonto who wrote (32186 ) 9/4/1999 9:43:00 AM From: tonto Respond to of 55532
Pugs starts his personal attacks on me because of the following post. The purpose of my post was to provide information I knew from the top officers regarding the identities of the 26 members. I never brought this information to the thread before the post. A consistent problem has been the way one can ask questions to mislead individuals. Star Gate did some tremendous work and the protocal was excellent.To: tonto who wrote (32186) From: Pugs Friday, Jan 2 1998 9:13AM ET Respond to Post # 32201 of 54839 Tonto, You're making a fool of yourself. I thought that it may have been beneath you to attack RMIL longs personally. No one has attacked you. Rileys' personal life is none of your buisness. Also, I'm confident that his claims are valid and true, regardless...Its' a shame to see reduced to the likes of s martin/Doug54/SMARTIN8231 and Kugler......Can we now start dissecting your personal life? Pugs Why the attack? Message #32186 from tonto at Jan 2 1998 7:58AM >>Ed Dames is from PSI-Tech. Which is another Remote Viewing business. Ed was with the CIA and DIA project Grill Flame, later called Star Gate. Was I a member, or am I still a member, I can not say!<< Why could he not say? The members are free to identify themselves and do.When I first started posting and having spent 6 days in August at a research facility in Virginia with former members and commanding officers of Star Gate, I asked them if they knew you. Those members do not know you, nor had any knowledge about you, nor did they recognize your picture. As I recall there were approximately 26 members in Star Gate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------