SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yousef who wrote (27554)1/2/1998 12:10:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Respond to of 1570547
 
Basically, Buckwheat, I think he's trying to tell you that the lower voltage Intel chips will theoretically run at higher mhz levels. So you're abolutely right that the warnings about higher power consumption making a 2.2v chip unsuitable for notebooks are horsesh*t. So while we already knew that Intel may be a couple of speed grades ahead of AMD, the NEW info introduced into the equation is that AMD will have a notebook product it didn't have before. This means higher ASPs for AMD and lower ASPs for Intel, regardless of whether or not the chip competes at the highest end of the notebook market. And remember, K6 outperformes P55C at a given clock speed, so Intel had better make damn well sure it can ship at higher clocks than AMD.



To: Yousef who wrote (27554)1/2/1998 2:04:00 PM
From: Buckwheat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1570547
 
Yousef, your points on voltage and process generation are well taken. Likewise, I hope my point on the cpu voltage/battery life concerns is also well taken.

I would also hope that my point on Intel's (make it easier for laptop makers) IMM technology was also well taken. Why do you suppose these IMM equiped machines didn't quite measure up to the Micron?

Buckwheat