Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (970082)	10/4/2016 5:29:15 PM
From: d[-_-]b	2 Recommendations Recommended By jlallen locogringo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574636

That is counterfactual. Like when they apologize for making edits that paint a story differently than factual to fit a narrative?

To: combjelly who wrote (970082)

10/4/2016 5:53:28 PM

From: locogringo

3 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
jlallen
Old Boothby

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574636

Please Tell Me These FBI/DOJ ‘Side Deals’
with Clinton E-Mail Suspects Didn’t Happen

Just when you think it can’t get any worse . . . According to House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte (R., Va.), the immunity agreements struck by the Justice Department with Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, two top subjects of the FBI’s Clinton e-mail investigation, included “side agreements.” Pursuant to these side agreements, it was stipulated that (a) the FBI would not scrutinize any documents dated after January 31, 2015 (i.e., about five weeks before the most disturbing actions suggestive of obstruction of justice occurred); and (b) the FBI — in an investigation critically involving destruction of documents — would
destroy the computers after conducting its search. These revelations are outlined in a letter Chairman Goodlatte penned yesterday to Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Goodlatte says his committee learned of the side deals upon reviewing the immunity agreements, which have not been made public. That review naturally prompted a demand by the committee to see the side deals, which — for reasons unexplained — the Justice Department elected not to provide when it gave the committee access to the immunity agreements. The side deals have also not been made public.

Read more at: nationalreview.com

Original Article