Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark silvers who wrote (29593)	1/2/1998 11:47:00 PM
From: Anne Lamb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Mark.. I know i saw the account of the proceedure<naxos COC proceedure>..but i cant remember where i saw it..<other than being repeated>..was it officially stated? I also remember that Kim has stated that the company was not pleased..do you know if they ever came back to BD and protested it? i know that IPM was upset with them long be4 their announcement..but never heard if any words were exchanged. Tim..i have seen you say this a couple of times..not sure if youre just agreeing or under the assumption that everyone was OK with BD's wording..i dont think anyone was..and indeed dont think they should be paid.No wonder they demand payment up front.. only hope is that no other company will use them in the desert..as i agree with you in that if they are worried about being associated with these companies.to the extent that they cant deliver what they are hired for...they need not accept work from them..