Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (970866)	10/8/2016 5:49:22 AM
From: Mongo2116	1 Recommendation Recommended By Don Hurst Respond to of 1576589

only an idiot would call the last 8 years a failure...yup!

To: i-node who wrote (970866)	10/8/2016 9:13:33 AM
From: zax	2 Recommendations Recommended By bentway Don Hurst Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576589

Clinton today on fivethirtyeight.com has an 82% chance of winning the presidency. These is based strictly upon polling from before Trump's "grab her right in the pussy" misogyny. I realize its only been two weeks since you were calling for a Trump landslide. Can you bring yourself to admit its all over? It really has been over for while.

To: i-node who wrote (970866)	10/9/2016 11:53:23 PM
From: RMF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576589

Clinton kept up the no-fly zone and that kept Saddam pretty well in check, at least regarding the Kurds and the Kurds have been pretty good allies for us against ISIS. I haven't been a fan of Obama's. We avoided a super crash after Lehman and others went down the tubes but I don't credit Obama much for that. In the debate tonight, Clinton said we should give arms to the Kurds and I'm for that. I like the Kurds and I think they could be good dependable allies compared to the Crap the Shiite Iraqis have given us. I think we should stick with Israel and the Kurds. Just like Russia sticks with the Iranians and Assad.