Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (971301)	10/9/2016 11:46:54 PM
From: Bonefish	2 Recommendations Recommended By Broken_Clock FJB Respond to of 1576688

Of course she'd have a fair trial if it came to that. The point taken was that she violated rule of law to the point she could be jailed. Serious matter.

To: puborectalis who wrote (971301)	10/10/2016 12:21:34 AM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By Stock Puppy Respond to of 1576688

Crap. That is not what she said you all of you nitwits know that.

To: puborectalis who wrote (971301)	10/10/2016 1:05:02 AM
From: Broken_Clock	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Respond to of 1576688

jail your opponent.....Putinesque You mean like Snowden, Assange, Chelse, or a dozen other that told the truth about Obama's lies?

To: puborectalis who wrote (971301)	10/10/2016 1:49:40 AM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 1576688

Former British Ambassador +++ A Blatant Neo-Con Lie 79 8 Oct, 2016 in Uncategorized by craig It is a plain lie that Russia was responsible for the leak of the Democratic National Committee emails to WikiLeaks. It is quite extraordinary that the Obama administration formally adopted the accusation yesterday. The US motivation is apparently to attempt to discredit in advance the further Hillary material that WikiLeaks plans to release in the coming month. The official statement that the leak was “consistent with the methods and motivation of Russian directed efforts” is carefully written by the NSA and, when you analyse it, extremely weak. What it says is “there is no evidence whatsoever but this is the sort of thing we think the Russians do”. As it happens, I have direct knowledge that there could not have been any evidence as it was not the Russians. That the Obama administration has made a formal accusation of Russia based on no evidence is, on one level, astonishing. But it is motivated by desperation. WikiLeaks have already announced that they have a huge cache of other material relating to Hillary’s shenanigans. The White House is simply seeking to discredit it in advance by a completely false association with Russian intelligence. It fascinates me that the media reports the story widely with no reference anywhere to what the DNC leak actually revealed – that the body organising the Democratic election had a consistent and active bias, doing everything possible to tilt the plating field and ensure that Hillary “won” against Bernie Sanders. The US government cares so little about its relationship with Russia that it is prepared to launch completely false allegations at the Kremlin in order to influence a domestic election. The implications of that are chilling. craigmurray.org.uk