SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (122902)10/13/2016 1:06:04 AM
From: bart13  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219873
 
just a few more weeks we should know what the average aggregate common denominator mostest wish to be reamed how

And no matter how it turns out, I'll be celebrating that it's finally over! I suspect that it won't actually be over though, given the power & control freaks (and those concerned about Diebold etc. voting machines) that won't like the outcome. Supreme Court cases, anyone?



To: TobagoJack who wrote (122902)10/13/2016 1:40:09 AM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219873
 
If Adolf Hitler were around I'm sure he'd quickly become the new President of China.

Charisma and brutality stands the test of time. It's always in demand by a certain type.

But it's possible Xi Jinping might out-terrorize Stalin and Hitler. The tyrant model may have been perfected over time.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (122902)10/13/2016 8:10:09 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219873
 
China's exports drop 10%, worse than seen

Published: Oct 13, 2016 2:33 a.m. ET

By

MARKMAGNIER

BEIJING--Chinese exports fell more steeply than expected last month, highlighting the persistent weakness in global demand that is weighing on the world's second-largest economy.

September's 10% year-over-year drop marks the sixth consecutive monthly decline and follows a 2.8% fall in August, the General Administration of Customs said Thursday. The drop was also markedly worse than a median forecast of a 3.2% decline from 16 economists polled by The Wall Street Journal.

Imports, meanwhile, fell 1.9% in September from a year earlier, reversing a 1.5% increase in August. The import data was also weaker than expected. The falloff in imports and exports resulted in China's trade surplus narrowing to a less-than-anticipated $41.99 billion in September from $52.05 billion in August.

"This data is disappointing and underlines that the fundamentals of the economy are still quite weak," said Amy Yuan Zhuang, an analyst with Nordea Bank. "This will add clouds to the growth outlook."

Growth has stabilized recently after Beijing's decision to pursue an accommodative monetary policy and ramp up infrastructure spending, but this masks deeper problems including weak private investment, mounting corporate debt and widespread industrial overcapacity, economists said.

Ms. Zhuang and other economists said anemic global demand was the main reason for September's weaker performance. Trade was down with all of China's major trading partners last month. The World Trade Organization expects global trade to grow by a slack 2.8% this year, marking a fifth straight year below 3%.

Robust exports a year ago also made the comparison with last month appear less favorable, economists said. Another factor in September's trade fall, some said: Samsung Group's production problems and recent decision to stop selling its Galaxy Note 7 smartphone. "China is a very important part of this supply chain," said BBVA Research economist Xia Le.

China's overseas shipments, once an important generator of growth, have declined in 14 of the past 15 months, a drag on the broader economy, economists said. Some said they expected Beijing to further depreciate the yuan in coming months to make exports more affordable.

"This depreciation will be gradual," said Ms. Zhuang. "They don't want a sharp decline" that might spook investors, increase capital outflow and spur financial instability, she said. The yuan has depreciated approximately 3% against the dollar and 6% against a broader basket of currencies so far in 2016.

Chinatop Home Products Manufacturing Co., which exports kitchen supplies to the U.S., said sales have declined by about 10% this year from 2015 levels. In response, the company, which is based in the southern city of Yangjiang, has cut prices by as much as 15% and periodically borrows from banks to smooth out its cash flow.

"The global economy is not very upbeat right now. And Americans aren't buying as much as they used to," said Chen Yangfan, a company salesman. "We hope that the economic situation will somehow recover in the fourth quarter."

Economists said September's import decline reflected continuing weakness in the domestic economy, with lower import volumes for major commodities such as copper and iron ore. "This could be an early sign that the recent recovery in economic activity is losing momentum, although we would caution against reading too much into a single data point," wrote Capital Economics in a research note.

Shen Danyang, spokesman for China's Ministry of Commerce, earlier this month said that foreign trade remained under heavy downward pressure, adding that the situation was "complicated and daunting" and there was no room for complacency, according to the official Xinhua News Agency.

Growing trade friction also hurts Chinese exports, Mr. Shen said. China has come under criticism from foreign officials who claim its companies are selling steel and other goods at prices below the cost of production. In the first eight month of the year, 20 countries or regions launched 85 trade investigations against Chinese products, a 49% increase over year-earlier levels, led by the U.S. and India, the ministry said.

Tagline to Lilian Lin and Liyan Qi

Write to Mark Magnier at mark.magnier@wsj.com

More from MarketWatch



To: TobagoJack who wrote (122902)10/13/2016 8:48:34 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone1 Recommendation

Recommended By
abuelita

  Respond to of 219873
 
Trump is a danger to our children???
Ridiculous!
===============================================

JONATHON VAN MAREN From the front lines of the culture wars



The horror stories are real. Don’t give your children a smartphone. Pornography

Oct. 4, 2016 ( LifeSiteNews) - After spending four days at the Coalition to End Sexual Exploitation Summit in Houston, Texas, my brain is very tired. We heard lectures on neuroscience, human trafficking, sexual abuse, child exploitation, and so much more. And we heard many, many lectures on the poison that is seeping in everywhere, fueling sexual abuse, destroying relationships, breaking down the ability of men to function, and obliterating childhood: pornography.

I’ll be writing a lot more about what I’ve learned (read my reports from the conference here, here, and here) but for now I’d like to make one simple plea to parents, something nearly every speaker and every lecturer advised: don’t give your children smartphones.

This advice has made me very unpopular in some circles—one teenager greeted me at a high school presentation by saying balefully, “So you’re the one who told my parents I shouldn’t have a cellphone.” But it is essential. Children, and most teenagers, do not need a phone with Internet access.

It’s crazy to think that a decade ago, smartphones were uncommon. Many people didn’t even own a cell phone. Now, as we heard from Vanity Fair journalist and author ofAmerican Girls: Social Media and the Secret Lives of Teenagers Nancy Jo Sales, nearly every social interaction - and sexual interaction - of teenagers is shaped by the tiny, always-throbbing devices they carry with them wherever they go. This has given rise to cyber-bullying and a spate of suicides, sexting and sexual exploitation of teens by teens, and the nearly non-stop viewing and amateur production of pornography. Teenagers - and children - are pulled into the social webs woven from Facebook to Instagram, from Snapchat to a half-dozen other underground cyber-settings, the interactions and content curated only by the children who populate them, free of parental or adult supervision.

Teenagers know that it’s making their lives miserable. The girls Sales talked to told her so. They also said that they had no way of getting out. Much of life is now lived online, and to opt out is to engage in voluntary isolation. The currency is often nude or sexually explicit pictures or “selfies”—and increasingly, that’s often non-optional, too.

Parents cannot control the new world of teenagers. In many cases, they cannot even penetrate it. That is why one man was so bewildered when his daughter hung herself after a teenager cruelly posted a video of her in the shower on Snapchat—that was the first time the girl’s bereaved father had ever even heard of Snapchat. For parents who wish to rescue their children from the cyber-jungle or spare them the pain that is engulfing millions, there are a number of answers. Open communication and open conversations. Attempted oversight of social media use. Accountability software and filters on all technological devices.

But for today, I just want to push one: Don’t give your children smartphones.

This advice has made me very unpopular in some circles—one teenager greeted me at a high school presentation by saying balefully, “So you’re the one who told my parents I shouldn’t have a cellphone.” But it is essential. Children, and most teenagers, do not need a phone with Internet access. They do not need nonstop access to social media sites that put them under the influence of their peers rather than adults. They do not need the social pressure that inevitably – inevitably - comes with entering a cyber-world of teenagers with new standards and new currency. And above all, they should not have access to all the pornography the web can offer, vile material that is setting new sexual standards teenagers across North America and beyond are beginning to conform to, through pressure, through force, or by choice.

Share this article to spread the word!



I heard dozens of stories this weekend of parents finding children on smartphones, watching hardcore pornography. Children younger than the former average age of first exposure to porn, which used to be age eleven. It’s now age nine. These children, in a few gawking, horrified moments, are robbed of their childhood. Their worlds change in that moment. They cannot unsee what they have seen. And they should never have had access to it in the first place.

Don’t give your children smartphones.

I understand that teenagers are more likely to actually need a cell phone. My parents signed for a cell phone for me when I got my driver’s license—not so I could interact with my friends or go online, but so they could contact me and I had a way of communicating with people when I was out and about. My first cell phones had no Internet capability, and I didn’t miss it. I sometimes wish my current phone didn’t have Internet either, because I’m as guilty as the rest of this generation of wasting time on my phone when I could be doing something - or anything, really - more productive. But when teenagers need a phone, they still don’t need a phone with Internet access. A phone that allows them to make phone calls and text is good enough. They don’t need nonstop social media connection, they don’t need SnapChat (a “sexting” app that destroys photos in seconds), and they absolutely should not have access to the twisted pornography that they will almost inevitably find.

Do not give the pornographers the access to your children that they seek. They know that children and teens are most likely to find porn on phones, and that’s why they’ve made a gargantuan effort in recent years to create porn that can be viewed and streamed on mobile devices. They know how to access your children—through a smartphone.

Don’t give them one.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (122902)10/13/2016 2:30:24 PM
From: stsimon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219873
 
The Russian people have been under someone's boot for the last thousand years. Compared with some of their prior tormentors perhaps Mr. Putin looks good to them. I wouldn't extrapolate that to too many other places.