Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PulpCutter who wrote (973862)	10/19/2016 5:54:59 PM
From: PulpCutter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576887

Lazy mouth-breathers busy in "Oh Donald-Donald-Donaaaallld!"circle jerk; can't do your own research, huh? WASHINGTON — American intelligence agencies believe that the Russian government was behind the theft of emails and documents from the Democratic National Committee, but many questions remain about how the documents made their way to WikiLeaks, which released them. Before the WikiLeaks release, a large sampling was published by several news organizations and a hacker called Guccifer 2.0, who investigators now believe was an agent of the G.R.U., Russia’s military intelligence service. American intelligence agencies say the earlier leaks from Guccifer and the WikiLeaks material have the same bits of code and telltale metadata traced to previous intrusions attributed to the G.R.U. or the F.S.B., another Russian spy agency