SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Senior who wrote (58233)10/20/2016 12:39:23 PM
From: George8  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78751
 
Technically SYNT looks really bad. What are the causes for the huge loss or write off? Can the bleeding be stopped for good? What are the dividend outlooks? I am looking to purchase a few shares.



To: Paul Senior who wrote (58233)10/20/2016 7:01:26 PM
From: staring1 Recommendation

Recommended By
E_K_S

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78751
 
Here's the approach I usually use:
Normalized EPS (based on average ROE) = average ROE over the sample period * BVPS (latest)
P/E ratio based on the normalized EPS = Current stock price / Normalized EPS (based on average ROE)
cfaglossary.blogspot.pt

The problem with this approach is that companies with high ROE barely need equity to operate. Therefore, the book value of equity in a given year affects the year's measure with no relation with operational performance. Therefore, I use an approach based on Net Income Margin:

Normalized EPS (based on average NIM) = average NIM over the sample period * Sales (latest)
P/E ratio based on the normalized EPS = Current stock price / Normalized EPS (based on average NIM)

One limitation of this approach is that does not account for potential unsustainable levels of Sales (Sales normalization would be recommendable, for instance through a regression). Nonetheless, I does not seem SYNT is having sales levels particularly abnormal compared with recent years, so I passed that adjustment.

2006-12 2007-12 2008-12 2009-12 2010-12 2011-12 2012-12 2013-12 2014-12 2015-12 TTM
Revenue 270 338 410 419 532 642 724 825 911 969 996
Net Inco 51 63 87 118 114 123 186 220 250 253 264
Margin 18.89% 18.64% 21.22% 28.16% 21.43% 19.16% 25.69% 26.67% 27.44% 26.11% 26.51%

The Normalized EPS for SYNT = 23.6% * 996 / 84 = 2.8
Normalized PE = 22.63 / 2.8 = 8.08

Even in a scenario that the company does not grow this multiple is very attractive. If it maintains a fraction of its growth in the last decade, then the company is a great value opportunity.



To: Paul Senior who wrote (58233)10/21/2016 6:13:03 PM
From: Graham Osborn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78751
 
It would be interesting to see what EKS's GN calculation is for this one. Although I think GNs oversimply, it does help capture the idea that you want a compromise between balance sheet and operating strength.