Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HPilot who wrote (974148)	10/21/2016 9:10:00 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574854

Actually, that is exactly what he said. You yourself bolded the relevant words. Although he did more than just imply. A great case in point is what happened in Ireland. A woman was pregnant in late term with a baby. The baby was dying, it had gone septic. The doctors refused to abort. The baby was still alive, although had zero chance of survival. The mother's health, although, was at risk. So what happened? She died. The baby was dead. This is a good example of why late-term abortion exists. As Hillary was saying, late-term abortions only happen when the situation is very dire. This isn't China back in the days of one child per family when they did abort perfectly viable babies even at the very last moment. Per usual, Trump is grandstanding and simplifying a very personal and complex issue. The reality in this country is that late term abortions only happen in a handful of cases, none of which would have resulted in a viable baby and a living mother if the abortion didn't happen. Trump is on record that he doesn't really care what happens to Melania as long as her boobs are intact. Most loving husbands want more...