SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gottfried who wrote (42015)1/2/1998 6:54:00 PM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
>>Another mistake is to assume that sheer volume sold
proves that the product is of uniformly good quality.<<

GM -

Agreed. I'm sure that some Zip, Jaz and Ditto drives and media are defective. No mass-produced product is perfect every time.

I have even had the experience of having a brand new Intel Pentium processor fail. I don't mean that it had a floating point bug, I mean it would not operate in protected mode. That meant I could run DOS on it, but not Windows 95.

I do believe that if a high percentage of Intel processors failed in this way, then AMD and Cyrix would sell a lot more of their products. No company can maintain such a huge share of a market without satisfying most of their customers. This applies to Iomega as well.

I simply cannot ignore the fact that in my personal experience, in a broad range of environments, Zip and Jaz owners who are happy are the norm. Yes, many of the people who are posting on the Iomega Zip/Jaz newsgroup are unhappy. But this amounts to a statistically insignificant sample relative to the number of units sold by Iomega.

I have yet to see any reliable evidence to contradict my own experience. Yes, I have a long position in IOM, so I could be considered biased. But if I believed that Iomega's products were unreliable as a general rule, I would close out that long position in a hot New York minute. (At a nice profit, I must say.)

- Allen