Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (976085)	10/28/2016 6:01:11 PM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By Old Boothby Respond to of 1576893

LOL, the server wasn't illegal. Maybe, but what's on it might be. Rumor is that it's a server that was never discovered by the FBI, and Hillary never mentioned this one. Might be bigger than you think.

To: Land Shark who wrote (976085)	10/28/2016 6:31:54 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576893

yes it was under the espionage act The part of the Espionage Act cited by each FBI source is Section 793(f), which deals with the handling of sensitive national defense information. It reads as follows. “Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer — Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” The above quote was obtained from Cornell University Law School, where the full text of 18 U.S. Code 793 is also available. According to the intelligence source that spoke to Fox News, use of an unsecured computer network, or a poorly-secured private email server, could constitute “gross negligence” under Subsection F of the Espionage Act. The anonymous FBI agent who spoke to the Daily Mail agreed that Hillary Clinton could face prosecution if the probe determines that the former Secretary of State did not take appropriate measures in securing the data that passed through, and was stored on, her private server. Read more at inquisitr.com

To: Land Shark who wrote (976085)	10/28/2016 6:34:00 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB TideGlider Respond to of 1576893

Hillary and the Espionage Act of 1917 By Mark A. Hewitt Last week I asked about Hillary Clinton’s email practices, Is it Espionage? Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton insisted that she “had broken no rules” to conduct government business through the use of a private email service in lieu of the U.S. government’s unclassified system, the Non-classified Internet Protocol (IP) Router Network (abbreviated as NIPRNet) and the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet). These are a system of interconnected computer networks used by the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of State to transmit classified information. The U.S. government has spent billions of dollars developing, deploying and protecting its Internet protocol router networks to enable authorized government officials to conduct the business of government, properly exchange information and intelligence, up to and including information classified SECRET, with others in the government (and their contractors) that are authorized and entitled to have it. The Democratic Presidential candidate under investigation by the FBI has disclosed that her aides had deleted more than 30,000 emails that she deemed personal. 30,000 emails printed out represents a stack of 60 reams of paper, a stack 10 feet tall. When the FBI retrieved the spools of microfilm, the Alger Hiss “Pumpkin Papers” printed out to a stack 4 ½ feet tall.