Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (18448)	11/2/2016 11:01:44 PM
From: John Pitera	2 Recommendations Recommended By Hawkmoon sixty2nds Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 33421

Old saying: The cover up is worse than the crime. If HRC becomes President I would think that a popular bet that will appear on hundreds of thousands of t -shirts, hats, bill boards, bumper stickers etc will be an over or under. The subject of the over/under will be does HRC serve for less or longer than President Nixon did in his second term. JP

To: Elroy who wrote (18448)	11/2/2016 11:15:46 PM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Recommended By sixty2nds Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33421

If this is true, then shouldn't each classified email on Hillary's server have some chain which leads back to the original sender, and that person broke the law? A lot of variables there.. Was the email and/or file sent as a whole, or were excerpts extracted from the original and incorporated into the unclassified message. Reportedly, there were classified paragraphs (each paragraph has to be marked with it's classification eg: (C), (S), (TS w/caveat).. FOUO, SBU.. or (U) for unclassified.. etc) incorporated into those emails on Hillary's server.. I have the sense that some of these paragraphs were lifted from classified messages and pasted into the unclassified emails. There are also issues related to information that the sender, or recipient, should have automatically known were classified by their very nature ( private conversations with foreign leaders.. etc) So the question is whether these emails were sent to Hillary, or did one of her staffers (or herself?) actually take a classified message and strip paragraphs to be pasted into her unclassified emails. Either way.. it requires someone accessing a classified network, downloading the pertinent information, and then uploading it onto an unclassified network somewhere.. I'm sure the intel folks are attempting to track down the leaks.. Sidney Blumenthal reportedly sent TS/SI (sigint) emails to Hillary, which means someone delivered them to him.. But obviously the first person to initiate the email chain with classified infomation would be the first individual to investigate... Btw, just some technical trivia.. When someone uploads classified information onto a unclassified system, they have automatically upgraded the classification level of that computer to the level of the information that was uploaded. And here's a little tidbit about what is coming in the future from Wiener's laptop investigation.. realclearpolitics.com Hawk

To: Elroy who wrote (18448)	11/4/2016 4:19:02 AM
From: Fintas	4 Recommendations Recommended By alanrs Hawkmoon sixty2nds toccodolce Respond to of 33421

Sorry but it's much bigger. She INTENTIONALLY broke the law setting up that private server and did so to conduct unlawful business aka R.I.C.O. While she intentionally conducted illegal activities thru the Clinton Foundation classified and Top Secret Docs were made available to those who hack and it's not a question of whether she's guilty. She guilty as sin. How about we don't put her in office. Simple enough for me. Fintas