Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: workingclassman9 who wrote (4227)	1/3/1998 12:10:00 AM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 11708

All right, I seem like I'm ready to become Director of the Bureau of the Census, but here's another survey. This is very informal. I received an E Mail from one of the contest entrants who is not an SI member, but who has invested in CSMA. He believes the title of our humble thread (CSMA@.30--Short squeeze in effect) is quite inappropriate--now especially. I agree. We certainly ain't at $.30 and there ain't no short squeeze. As such, the current thread title may turn people off because: 1. .30 is too low for them and they scan right by it; 2. they missed it at .30 and at 1.00 it is now too high for them; 3. they may be turned off by the reference to short squeeze (see RMIL). I am resolute against creating a new thread. Divided we fall, you know . Having to check multiple threads is a pain. I'm going thru that hassle with NETZ now. I Emailed the SI webmistress, Jill, and she said she could rename the title of the thread. So... what do you say gang? Who is for a rename? It would be nice to come up with one that is not price/situation sensitive but truly reflects what CSMA is all about. We got a consumer product(AdHatters), we got a financial arm (LPS), we got an energy sector (Coconino Oil and Gas/M3 joint venture) and we got a waste management sector. Let me throw out a trial balloon: CSMA mini-conglomerate--the next GE? Also, you may want to think about a new opening post. I don't know if that is easily do-able within the SI framework but I can check with Jill. Talk amongst yourselves. TG